LibraryFamily 7 · Mental Health & Neurology
AI triage for child & adolescent mental health
Under reviewPilotDeveloping evidence
Undergoing in-depth clinical, technical and governance review.
Collects symptom information conversationally and routes the referral to the right CAMHS clinical team, escalating safety risks to a clinician in under five minutes.
Plain-language summary
AIChoose an audience and generate a tailored summary on demand. The AI uses only what is on this page.
Clinical context
- Clinical problem
- Support communication
- Point of care
- Triage
- Nature of AI output
- A classification
- Clinical specialty
- Psychiatry
- Care setting
- Community care
- Patient population
- Adolescents (13–17) self-referring to a child and adolescent mental-health service.
- Intended use
- Collects symptom information conversationally and routes the referral to the right CAMHS clinical team, escalating safety risks to a clinician in under five minutes.
Technology
- AI technique
- NLP / large language model
- Input data
- Patient-reported data
- Output type
- Classification
- Autonomy level
- Human in the loop (human acts)
- Model provenance
- Vendor proprietary
- Model version
- care-1.3
- Built on a general-purpose model
- Yes
Deployment
- Status
- Pilot
- Country
- Sweden
- Deployment date
- 1 February 2025
- Sites
- 1
Regulatory & governance
- EU AI Act risk tier
- Limited risk
- High-risk basis
- Not applicable
- Medical device
- No
- EU MDR class
- Not a device
- CE marking
- Not required
- FDA status
- Not applicable
- ISO 14971 risk class
- Low
- GDPR processing basis
- Consent
- GDPR DPIA
- Completed
- Data identifiability
- Pseudonymised
- Explainability method
- None
- Human oversight model
- A clinician reviews every referral before the first appointment; risk responses raise an immediate human alert.
NICE evidence standards
- ESF tier
- Tier B — inform / monitor
- Evidence category
- Category 2
Performance summary
- Headline metric
- Accuracy
- Value
- 0.88
- Subgroup performance assessed
- Yes
- Known bias signals
- Reduced sensitivity for under-15s — flagged for additional validation.
Similar deployments
AILooking for close matches in the Library…
Safety signals
Post-deployment concerns flagged by clinicians, patients or monitoring (proposal §3.7). High or critical signals re-enter a validated use case into maturation automatically.
Clinician reports a misrouted referral for an adolescent with neurodivergent presentation.
Raised 17 May 2026, 21:01
LowInvestigating
Evidence records
Studies and evaluations attached to this use case.
Retrospective validation
Sensitivity: 0.92
Population: Retrospective comparison vs senior clinician triage, 1.5k cases
Subgroup: female
Prospective observational
Accuracy: 0.88
Population: CAMHS self-referral pilot, 8k referrals
Contributors
- Deploying organisation
- [demo] Karolinska University Hospital · Hospital / health system · Sweden
- AI vendor
- [demo] Limbic · United Kingdom
- Product name
- Limbic Care